Bias correction and uncertainty characterization of Dead-Reckoned paths of marine mammals

Table 1 Results from the leave-one-out cross-validation analysis of the four data sets

Data set	BM approach		Conventional	Linear interpolation
Data set	Coverage (%)	CV-RMSE	CV-RMSE	CV-RMSE
Trip 1 Easting	99.3	0.37	0.49	0.43
Trip 1 Northing	98.2	0.39	0.50	0.51
Trip 2 Easting	99.2	1.03	1.02	1.47
Trip 2 Northing	100	0.85	1.15	1.06

The first column is the actual coverage percentage for the BM posterior 95 % CI (how many of the GPS observations were actually covered by the 95 % CI from our BM trained without it). The cross-validation root mean squared errors (CV-RMSE) in kilometers (km) from our BM approach, the conventional method [1], and linear interpolation are in the last three columns

ISSN: 2050-3385