Bias correction and uncertainty characterization of Dead-Reckoned paths of marine mammals

Table 2 Results from the leave-5-out cross-validation studies of the four data sets

Data set	BM approach		Conventional	Linear interpolation
Data set	Coverage (%)	CV-RMSE	CV-RMSE	CV-RMSE
Trip 1 Easting	97.8	0.73	1.04	1.13
Trip 1 Northing	95.9	0.80	1.25	1.16
Trip 2 Easting	93.7	2.52	2.67	3.84
Trip 2 Northing	92.9	3.06	3.33	4.44

The first column is the actual coverage percentage for the BM posterior 95 % CI (how many of the GPS observations were actually covered by the 95 % CI from our BM trained without it). The last three columns contain the cross-validation root mean squared errors (CV-RMSE) in kilometers (km) from our BM approach, the conventional method [1], and linear interpolation

ISSN: 2050-3385